• ISSN 1674-8301
  • CN 32-1810/R
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Xiaowei Liu, Fumihiko Nakamura. Mechanotransduction, nanotechnology, and nanomedicine[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research. doi: 10.7555/JBR.34.20200063
Citation: Xiaowei Liu, Fumihiko Nakamura. Mechanotransduction, nanotechnology, and nanomedicine[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research. doi: 10.7555/JBR.34.20200063

Mechanotransduction, nanotechnology, and nanomedicine

doi: 10.7555/JBR.34.20200063
More Information
  • Corresponding author: Fumihiko Nakamura, School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300072, China. Tel: +86-22-87401830, E-mail: fnakamura@tju.edu.cn
  • Received: 29 April 2020
  • Revised: 26 May 2020
  • Accepted: 29 May 2020
  • Published: 31 July 2020
  • Mechanotransduction, a conversion of mechanical forces into biochemical signals, is essential for human development and physiology. It is observable at all levels ranging from the whole body, organs, tissues, organelles down to molecules. Dysregulation results in various diseases such as muscular dystrophies, hypertension-induced vascular and cardiac hypertrophy, altered bone repair and cell deaths. Since mechanotransduction occurs at nanoscale, nanosciences and applied nanotechnology are powerful for studying molecular mechanisms and pathways of mechanotransduction. Atomic force microscopy, magnetic and optical tweezers are commonly used for force measurement and manipulation at the single molecular level. Force is also used to control cells, topographically and mechanically by specific types of nano materials for tissue engineering. Mechanotransduction research will become increasingly important as a sub-discipline under nanomedicine. Here we review nanotechnology approaches using force measurements and manipulations at the molecular and cellular levels during mechanotransduction, which has been increasingly play important role in the advancement of nanomedicine.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Urner S, Kelly-Goss M, Peirce SM, et al. Mechanotransduction in blood and lymphatic vascular development and disease[J]. Adv Pharmacol, 2018, 81: 155–208. doi:  10.1016/bs.apha.2017.08.009
    [2] Malakou LS, Gargalionis AN, Piperi C, et al. Molecular mechanisms of mechanotransduction in psoriasis[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2018, 6(12): 245. doi:  10.21037/atm.2018.04.09
    [3] Broders-Bondon F, Nguyen Ho-Bouldoires TH, Fernandez-Sanchez ME, et al. Mechanotransduction in tumor progression: the dark side of the force[J]. J Cell Biol, 2018, 217(5): 1571–1587. doi:  10.1083/jcb.201701039
    [4] Nakamura F. Mechanotransduction in blood cells[J]. Asia-Pacific J Blood Types Genes, 2017, 1(1): 1–9.
    [5] Maycas M, Esbrit P, Gortázar AR. Molecular mechanisms in bone mechanotransduction[J]. Histol Histopathol, 2017, 32(8): 751–760.
    [6] Lyon RC, Zanella F, Omens JH, et al. Mechanotransduction in cardiac hypertrophy and failure[J]. Circ Res, 2015, 116(8): 1462–1476. doi:  10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.304937
    [7] Vincent TL. Targeting mechanotransduction pathways in osteoarthritis: a focus on the pericellular matrix[J]. Curr Opin Pharmacol, 2013, 13(3): 449–454. doi:  10.1016/j.coph.2013.01.010
    [8] Cheng CM, Tang MJ. Review series - mechanotransduction from physiology to disease states[J]. J Cell Mol Med, 2013, 17(2): 223–224. doi:  10.1111/jcmm.12037
    [9] French AS. Mechanotransduction[J]. Annu Rev Physiol, 1992, 54: 135–152. doi:  10.1146/annurev.ph.54.030192.001031
    [10] Petridou NI, Spiró Z, Heisenberg CP. Multiscale force sensing in development[J]. Nat Cell Biol, 2017, 19(6): 581–588. doi:  10.1038/ncb3524
    [11] Vogel V, Sheetz M. Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions[J]. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2006, 7(4): 265–275. doi:  10.1038/nrm1890
    [12] Najrana T, Sanchez-Esteban J. Mechanotransduction as an adaptation to gravity[J]. Front Pediatr, 2016, 4: 140.
    [13] Humphrey JD, Dufresne ER, Schwartz MA. Mechanotransduction and extracellular matrix homeostasis[J]. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2014, 15(12): 802–812.
    [14] Wozniak MA, Chen CS. Mechanotransduction in development: a growing role for contractility[J]. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2009, 10(1): 34–43. doi:  10.1038/nrm2592
    [15] Uroz M, Wistorf S, Serra-Picamal X, et al. Regulation of cell cycle progression by cell-cell and cell-matrix forces[J]. Nat Cell Biol, 2018, 20(6): 646–654. doi:  10.1038/s41556-018-0107-2
    [16] Young SM, Liu S, Joshi R, et al. Localization and stretch-dependence of lung elastase activity in development and compensatory growth[J]. J Appl Physiol (1985), 2015, 118(7): 921–931. doi:  10.1152/japplphysiol.00954.2014
    [17] Liu J, Yu W, Liu Y, et al. Mechanical stretching stimulates collagen synthesis via down-regulating SO2/AAT1 pathway[J]. Sci Rep, 2016, 6(1): 21112. doi:  10.1038/srep21112
    [18] Wang E. Age-dependent atrophy and microgravity travel: what do they have in common?[J]. FASEB J, 1999, 13(9001): S167–S174.
    [19] Blaber E, Marçal H, Burns BP. Bioastronautics: the influence of microgravity on astronaut health[J]. Astrobiology, 2010, 10(5): 463–473. doi:  10.1089/ast.2009.0415
    [20] Bamman MM, Roberts BM, Adams GR. Molecular regulation of exercise-induced muscle fiber hypertrophy[J]. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med, 2018, 8(6): a029751. doi:  10.1101/cshperspect.a029751
    [21] Olsen LA, Nicoll JX, Fry AC. The skeletal muscle fiber: a mechanically sensitive cell[J]. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2019, 119(2): 333–349. doi:  10.1007/s00421-018-04061-x
    [22] Kim HJ, Choi YS, Jeong MJ, et al. Expression of UNCL during development of periodontal tissue and response of periodontal ligament fibroblasts to mechanical stress in vivo and in vitro[J]. Cell Tissue Res, 2007, 327(1): 25–31.
    [23] O'Conor CJ, Case N, Guilak F. Mechanical regulation of chondrogenesis[J]. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2013, 4(4): 61. doi:  10.1186/scrt211
    [24] Fearing BV, Hernandez PA, Setton LA, et al. Mechanotransduction and cell biomechanics of the intervertebral disc[J]. JOR Spine, 2018, 1(3): e1026. doi:  10.1002/jsp2.1026
    [25] Bradamante S, Barenghi L, Maier JAM. Stem cells toward the future: the space challenge[J]. Life (Basel), 2014, 4(2): 267–280.
    [26] Ivanovska IL, Shin JW, Swift J, et al. Stem cell mechanobiology: diverse lessons from bone marrow[J]. Trends Cell Biol, 2015, 25(9): 523–532. doi:  10.1016/j.tcb.2015.04.003
    [27] Wei SC, Yang J. Forcing through tumor metastasis: the interplay between tissue rigidity and epithelial-mesenchymal transition[J]. Trends Cell Biol, 2016, 26(2): 111–120. doi:  10.1016/j.tcb.2015.09.009
    [28] Sokolov I, Iyer S, Woodworth CD. Recovery of elasticity of aged human epithelial cells in vitro[J]. Nanomedicine, 2006, 2(1): 31–36. doi:  10.1016/j.nano.2005.12.002
    [29] Pelissier FA, Garbe JC, Ananthanarayanan B, et al. Age-related dysfunction in mechanotransduction impairs differentiation of human mammary epithelial progenitors[J]. Cell Rep, 2014, 7(6): 1926–1939. doi:  10.1016/j.celrep.2014.05.021
    [30] Casey T, Patel OV, Plaut K. Transcriptomes reveal alterations in gravity impact circadian clocks and activate mechanotransduction pathways with adaptation through epigenetic change[J]. Physiol Genomics, 2015, 47(4): 113–128. doi:  10.1152/physiolgenomics.00117.2014
    [31] Uhler C, Shivashankar GV. Regulation of genome organization and gene expression by nuclear mechanotransduction[J]. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2017, 18(12): 717–727. doi:  10.1038/nrm.2017.101
    [32] Barzegari A, Omidi Y, Ostadrahimi A, et al. The role of Piezo proteins and cellular mechanosensing in tuning the fate of transplanted stem cells[J]. Cell Tissue Res, 2020, 381(1): 1–12. doi:  10.1007/s00441-020-03191-z
    [33] Dupont S, Morsut L, Aragona M, et al. Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction[J]. Nature, 2011, 474(7350): 179–183. doi:  10.1038/nature10137
    [34] Huang XW, Yang NH, Fiore VF, et al. Matrix stiffness-induced myofibroblast differentiation is mediated by intrinsic mechanotransduction[J]. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol, 2012, 47(3): 340–348. doi:  10.1165/rcmb.2012-0050OC
    [35] Jaalouk DE, Lammerding J. Mechanotransduction gone awry[J]. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2009, 10(1): 63–73. doi:  10.1038/nrm2597
    [36] Asano S, Ito S, Morosawa M, et al. Cyclic stretch enhances reorientation and differentiation of 3-D culture model of human airway smooth muscle[J]. Biochem Biophys Rep, 2018, 16: 32–38.
    [37] Yamamoto K, Ando J. Vascular endothelial cell membranes differentiate between stretch and shear stress through transitions in their lipid phases[J]. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 2015, 309(7): H1178–H185. doi:  10.1152/ajpheart.00241.2015
    [38] Takahara N, Ito S, Furuya K, et al. Real-time imaging of ATP release induced by mechanical stretch in human airway smooth muscle cells[J]. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol, 2014, 51(6): 772–782. doi:  10.1165/rcmb.2014-0008OC
    [39] Liu C, Montell C. Forcing open TRP channels: Mechanical gating as a unifying activation mechanism[J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2015, 460(1): 22–25. doi:  10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.02.067
    [40] Vitzthum C, Clauss WG, Fronius M. Mechanosensitive activation of CFTR by increased cell volume and hydrostatic pressure but not shear stress[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2015, 1848: 2942–2951. doi:  10.1016/j.bbamem.2015.09.009
    [41] Yang L, Yang Y, Wang S, et al. In vitro mechanical loading models for periodontal ligament cells: from two-dimensional to three-dimensional models[J]. Arch Oral Biol, 2015, 60(3): 416–424. doi:  10.1016/j.archoralbio.2014.11.012
    [42] Chukkapalli SS, Lele TP. Periodontal cell mechanotransduction[J]. Open Biol, 2018, 8(9): 180053. doi:  10.1098/rsob.180053
    [43] Anderson DE, Johnstone B. Dynamic mechanical compression of chondrocytes for tissue engineering: a critical review[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2017, 5: 76. doi:  10.3389/fbioe.2017.00076
    [44] Gongol B, Marin T, Zhang J, et al. Shear stress regulation of miR-93 and miR-484 maturation through nucleolin[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2019, 116(26): 12974–12979. doi:  10.1073/pnas.1902844116
    [45] Torday JS. Parathyroid hormone-related protein is a gravisensor in lung and bone cell biology[J]. Adv Space Res, 2003, 32(8): 1569–1576. doi:  10.1016/S0273-1177(03)90397-8
    [46] Baio J, Martinez AF, Silva I, et al. Cardiovascular progenitor cells cultured aboard the International Space Station exhibit altered developmental and functional properties[J]. npj Microgravity, 2018, 4: 13. doi:  10.1038/s41526-018-0048-x
    [47] Lu DY, Sun SJ, Zhang F, et al. Microgravity-induced hepatogenic differentiation of rBMSCs on board the SJ-10 satellite[J]. FASEB J, 2019, 33(3): 4273–4286. doi:  10.1096/fj.201802075R
    [48] Lim K, Kim J, Seonwoo H, et al. In vitro effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulation on the osteogenic differentiation of human alveolar bone-derived mesenchymal stem cells for tooth tissue engineering[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2013, 2013: 269724.
    [49] Jiang L, Sun ZL, Chen XF, et al. Cells sensing mechanical cues: stiffness influences the lifetime of cell-extracellular matrix interactions by affecting the loading rate[J]. ACS Nano, 2016, 10(1): 207–217. doi:  10.1021/acsnano.5b03157
    [50] Gong Z, Szczesny SE, Caliari SR, et al. Matching material and cellular timescales maximizes cell spreading on viscoelastic substrates[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2018, 115(12): E2686–E2695. doi:  10.1073/pnas.1716620115
    [51] Hieda M. Signal transduction across the nuclear envelope: role of the LINC complex in bidirectional signaling[J]. Cells, 2019, 8(2): 124. doi:  10.3390/cells8020124
    [52] Zhao QC, Zhou H, Li XM, et al. The mechanosensitive Piezo1 channel: a three-bladed propeller-like structure and a lever-like mechanogating mechanism[J]. FEBS J, 2019, 286(13): 2461–2470. doi:  10.1111/febs.14711
    [53] Nakamura F, Stossel TP, Hartwig JH. The filamins: organizers of cell structure and function[J]. Cell Adh Migr, 2011, 5(2): 160–169. doi:  10.4161/cam.5.2.14401
    [54] Ehrlicher AJ, Nakamura F, Hartwig JH, et al. Mechanical strain in actin networks regulates FilGAP and integrin binding to filamin A[J]. Nature, 2011, 478(7368): 260–263. doi:  10.1038/nature10430
    [55] Razinia Z, Mäkelä T, Ylänne J, et al. Filamins in mechanosensing and signaling[J]. Annu Rev Biophys, 2012, 41: 227–246. doi:  10.1146/annurev-biophys-050511-102252
    [56] Wang L, Nakamura F. Identification of Filamin A mechanobinding partner I: smoothelin specifically interacts with the filamin A Mechanosensitive domain 21[J]. Biochemistry, 2019, 58(47): 4726–4736. doi:  10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00100
    [57] Wang J, Nakamura F. Identification of Filamin A mechanobinding partner Ⅱ: fimbacin is a novel actin cross-linking and Filamin A binding protein[J]. Biochemistry, 2019, 58(47): 4737–4743. doi:  10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00101
    [58] Haining AWM, Rahikainen R, Cortes E, et al. Mechanotransduction in talin through the interaction of the R8 domain with DLC1[J]. PLoS Biol, 2018, 16(7): e2005599. doi:  10.1371/journal.pbio.2005599
    [59] Zhang XH, Halvorsen K, Zhang CZ, et al. Mechanoenzymatic cleavage of the ultralarge vascular protein von Willebrand factor[J]. Science, 2009, 324(5932): 1330–1334. doi:  10.1126/science.1170905
    [60] Crawley JTB, de Groot R, Xiang YZ, et al. Unraveling the scissile bond: how ADAMTS13 recognizes and cleaves von Willebrand factor[J]. Blood, 2011, 118(12): 3212–3221. doi:  10.1182/blood-2011-02-306597
    [61] Goutman JD, Elgoyhen AB, Gómez-Casati ME. Cochlear hair cells: the sound-sensing machines[J]. FEBS Lett, 2015, 589(22): 3354–3361. doi:  10.1016/j.febslet.2015.08.030
    [62] Chen CH, Lin YH, Chen CH, et al. Transforming growth factor beta 1 mediates the low-frequency vertical vibration enhanced production of tenomodulin and type I collagen in rat Achilles tendon[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(10): e0205258. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0205258
    [63] Turner DC, Edmiston AM, Zohner YE, et al. Transient intraocular pressure fluctuations: source, magnitude, frequency, and associated mechanical energy[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2019, 60(7): 2572–2582. doi:  10.1167/iovs.19-26600
    [64] Mathieu S, Manneville JB. Intracellular mechanics: connecting rheology and mechanotransduction[J]. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 2019, 56: 34–44. doi:  10.1016/j.ceb.2018.08.007
    [65] Wang N, Tytell JD, Ingber DE. Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus[J]. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2009, 10(1): 75–82. doi:  10.1038/nrm2594
    [66] Belaadi N, Millon-Frémillon A, Aureille J, et al. Analyzing mechanotransduction through the LINC complex in isolated nuclei[M]//Gundersen GG, Worman HJ. The LINC Complex. New York: Humana Press, 2018: 73–80.
    [67] Wang SS, Stoops E, Cp U, et al. Mechanotransduction via the LINC complex regulates DNA replication in myonuclei[J]. J Cell Biol, 2018, 217(6): 2005–2018. doi:  10.1083/jcb.201708137
    [68] Elosegui-Artola A, Andreu I, Beedle AEM, et al. Force triggers YAP nuclear entry by regulating transport across nuclear pores[J]. Cell, 2017, 171(6): 1397–1410.e14. doi:  10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.008
    [69] Shim JW, Wise DA, Elder SH. Effect of cytoskeletal disruption on Mechanotransduction of hydrostatic pressure by C3H10T1/2 murine fibroblasts[J]. Open Orthop J, 2008, 2: 155–162. doi:  10.2174/1874325000802010155
    [70] Thomasy SM, Morgan JT, Wood JA, et al. Substratum stiffness and latrunculin B modulate the gene expression of the mechanotransducers YAP and TAZ in human trabecular meshwork cells[J]. Exp Eye Res, 2013, 113: 66–73. doi:  10.1016/j.exer.2013.05.014
    [71] Yang B, McJunkin K. CRISPR screening strategies for microRNA target identification[J]. FEBS J, 2020, . doi:  10.1111/febs.15218
    [72] Calderwood DA, Huttenlocher A, Kiosses WB, et al. Increased filamin binding to β-integrin cytoplasmic domains inhibits cell migration[J]. Nat Cell Biol, 2001, 3(12): 1060–1068. doi:  10.1038/ncb1201-1060
    [73] Ohta Y, Hartwig JH, Stossel TP. FilGAP, a Rho- and ROCK-regulated GAP for Rac binds filamin A to control actin remodelling[J]. Nat Cell Biol, 2006, 8(8): 803–814. doi:  10.1038/ncb1437
    [74] Fal K, Asnacios A, Chabouté ME, et al. Nuclear envelope: a new frontier in plant mechanosensing?[J]. Biophys Rev, 2017, 9(4): 389–403. doi:  10.1007/s12551-017-0302-6
    [75] Hirata H, Tatsumi H, Sokabe M. Mechanical forces facilitate actin polymerization at focal adhesions in a Zyxin-dependent manner[J]. J Cell Sci, 2008, 121(17): 2795–2804. doi:  10.1242/jcs.030320
    [76] Moreno-Vicente R, Pavon DM, Martin-Padura I, et al. Caveolin-1 Modulates Mechanotransduction responses to substrate stiffness through actin-dependent control of YAP[J]. Cell Rep, 2018, 25(6): 1622–1635.e6. doi:  10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.024
    [77] Chang L, Azzolin L, Di Biagio D, et al. The SWI/SNF complex is a mechanoregulated inhibitor of YAP and TAZ[J]. Nature, 2018, 563(7730): 265–269. doi:  10.1038/s41586-018-0658-1
    [78] Halder G, Dupont S, Piccolo S. Transduction of mechanical and cytoskeletal cues by YAP and TAZ[J]. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2012, 13(9): 591–600. doi:  10.1038/nrm3416
    [79] Zhang XQ, Hu XY, Lei HZ, et al. Mechanical force-induced polymerization and depolymerization of F-actin at water/solid interfaces[J]. Nanoscale, 2016, 8(11): 6008–6013. doi:  10.1039/C5NR08713A
    [80] Finch-Edmondson M, Sudol M. Framework to function: mechanosensitive regulators of gene transcription[J]. Cell Mol Biol Lett, 2016, 21(1): 28. doi:  10.1186/s11658-016-0028-7
    [81] Miralles F, Posern G, Zaromytidou AI, et al. Actin dynamics control SRF activity by regulation of its coactivator MAL[J]. Cell, 2003, 113(3): 329–342. doi:  10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00278-2
    [82] Hu X, Liu ZZ, Chen XY, et al. MKL1-actin pathway restricts chromatin accessibility and prevents mature pluripotency activation[J]. Nat Commun, 2019, 10(1): 1695. doi:  10.1038/s41467-019-09636-6
    [83] Dorland YL, Huveneers S. Cell-cell junctional mechanotransduction in endothelial remodeling[J]. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2017, 74(2): 279–292. doi:  10.1007/s00018-016-2325-8
    [84] Chen TC, Saw TB, Mège RM, et al. Mechanical forces in cell monolayers[J]. J Cell Sci, 2018, 131(24): jcs218156. doi:  10.1242/jcs.218156
    [85] Das T, Safferling K, Rausch S, et al. A molecular mechanotransduction pathway regulates collective migration of epithelial cells[J]. Nat Cell Biol, 2015, 17(3): 276–287. doi:  10.1038/ncb3115
    [86] Chakraborty S, Njah K, Pobbati AV, et al. Agrin as a Mechanotransduction signal regulating YAP through the hippo pathway[J]. Cell Rep, 2017, 18(10): 2464–2479. doi:  10.1016/j.celrep.2017.02.041
    [87] Wu PH, Aroush DRB, Asnacios A, et al. A comparison of methods to assess cell mechanical properties[J]. Nat Methods, 2018, 15(7): 491–498. doi:  10.1038/s41592-018-0015-1
    [88] Furuike S, Ito T, Yamazaki M. Mechanical unfolding of single filamin A (ABP-280) molecules detected by atomic force microscopy[J]. FEBS Lett, 2001, 498(1): 72–75. doi:  10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02497-8
    [89] Ferrer JM, Lee H, Chen J, et al. Measuring molecular rupture forces between single actin filaments and actin-binding proteins[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2008, 105(27): 9221–9226. doi:  10.1073/pnas.0706124105
    [90] Chen H, Yuan GH, Winardhi RS, et al. Dynamics of equilibrium folding and unfolding transitions of Titin immunoglobulin domain under constant forces[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2015, 137(10): 3540–3546. doi:  10.1021/ja5119368
    [91] Cossio P, Hummer G, Szabo A. On artifacts in single-molecule force spectroscopy[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2015, 112(46): 14248–14253. doi:  10.1073/pnas.1519633112
    [92] Rief M, Gautel M, Oesterhelt F, et al. Reversible unfolding of individual Titin immunoglobulin domains by AFM[J]. Science, 1997, 276(5315): 1109–1112. doi:  10.1126/science.276.5315.1109
    [93] Chen H, Zhu XY, Cong PW, et al. Differential mechanical stability of filamin A rod segments[J]. Biophys J, 2011, 101(5): 1231–1237. doi:  10.1016/j.bpj.2011.07.028
    [94] Neuman KC, Nagy A. Single-molecule force spectroscopy: optical tweezers, magnetic tweezers and atomic force microscopy[J]. Nat Methods, 2008, 5(6): 491–505. doi:  10.1038/nmeth.1218
    [95] Rognoni L, Stigler J, Pelz B, et al. Dynamic force sensing of filamin revealed in single-molecule experiments[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2012, 109(48): 19679–19684. doi:  10.1073/pnas.1211274109
    [96] Erickson HP. Reversible unfolding of fibronectin type Ⅲ and immunoglobulin domains provides the structural basis for stretch and elasticity of Titin and fibronectin[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1994, 91(21): 10114–10118. doi:  10.1073/pnas.91.21.10114
    [97] Finer JT, Simmons RM, Spudich JA. Single myosin molecule mechanics: piconewton forces and nanometre steps[J]. Nature, 1994, 368(6467): 113–119. doi:  10.1038/368113a0
    [98] Hunt AJ, Gittes F, Howard J. The force exerted by a single kinesin molecule against a viscous load[J]. Biophys J, 1994, 67(2): 766–781. doi:  10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80537-5
    [99] Grashoff C, Hoffman BD, Brenner MD, et al. Measuring mechanical tension across vinculin reveals regulation of focal adhesion dynamics[J]. Nature, 2010, 466(7303): 263–266. doi:  10.1038/nature09198
    [100] Ringer P, Weißl A, Cost AL, et al. Multiplexing molecular tension sensors reveals piconewton force gradient across talin-1[J]. Nat Methods, 2017, 14(11): 1090–1096. doi:  10.1038/nmeth.4431
    [101] del Rio A, Perez-Jimenez R, Liu RC, et al. Stretching single talin rod molecules activates vinculin binding[J]. Science, 2009, 323(5914): 638–641. doi:  10.1126/science.1162912
    [102] Charras G, Yap AS. Tensile forces and Mechanotransduction at cell-cell junctions[J]. Curr Biol, 2018, 28(8): R445–R457. doi:  10.1016/j.cub.2018.02.003
    [103] Ma VPY, Salaita K. DNA nanotechnology as an emerging tool to study Mechanotransduction in living systems[J]. Small, 2019, 15(26): 1900961. doi:  10.1002/smll.201900961
    [104] Huang Q, Lee J, Arce FT, et al. Nanofibre optic force transducers with sub-piconewton resolution via near-field plasmon-dielectric interactions[J]. Nat Photonics, 2017, 11(6): 352–355. doi:  10.1038/nphoton.2017.74
    [105] Seo D, Southard KM, Kim JW, et al. A Mechanogenetic toolkit for interrogating cell signaling in space and time[J]. Cell, 2016, 165(6): 1507–1518. doi:  10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.045
    [106] Shen YJ, Cheng Y, Uyeda TQP, et al. Cell Mechanosensors and the possibilities of using magnetic nanoparticles to study them and to modify cell fate[J]. Ann Biomed Eng, 2017, 45(10): 2475–2486. doi:  10.1007/s10439-017-1884-7
    [107] Gonçalves AI, Miranda MS, Rodrigues MT, et al. Magnetic responsive cell-based strategies for diagnostics and therapeutics[J]. Biomed Mater, 2018, 13(5): 054001. doi:  10.1088/1748-605X/aac78b
    [108] Nagayama K, Inoue T, Hamada Y, et al. Direct application of mechanical stimulation to cell adhesion sites using a novel magnetic-driven micropillar substrate[J]. Biomed Microdevices, 2018, 20(4): 85. doi:  10.1007/s10544-018-0328-y
    [109] Norregaard K, Metzler R, Ritter CM, et al. Manipulation and motion of organelles and single molecules in living cells[J]. Chem Rev, 2017, 117(5): 4342–4375. doi:  10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00638
    [110] Zhao DY, Liu SY, Gao Y. Single-molecule manipulation and detection[J]. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai), 2018, 50(3): 231–237. doi:  10.1093/abbs/gmx146
    [111] Cordova JC, Das DK, Manning HW, et al. Combining single-molecule manipulation and single-molecule detection[J]. Curr Opin Struct Biol, 2014, 28: 142–148. doi:  10.1016/j.sbi.2014.08.010
    [112] Fisher TE, Marszalek PE, Fernandez JM. Stretching single molecules into novel conformations using the atomic force microscope[J]. Nat Struct Biol, 2000, 7(9): 719–724. doi:  10.1038/78936
    [113] Fotiadis D, Scheuring S, Muller SA, et al. Imaging and manipulation of biological structures with the AFM[J]. Micron, 2002, 33(4): 385–397. doi:  10.1016/S0968-4328(01)00026-9
    [114] Ando T. Directly watching biomolecules in action by high-speed atomic force microscopy[J]. Biophys Rev, 2017, 9(4): 421–429. doi:  10.1007/s12551-017-0281-7
    [115] Charras GT, Lehenkari PP, Horton MA. Atomic force microscopy can be used to mechanically stimulate osteoblasts and evaluate cellular strain distributions[J]. Ultramicroscopy, 2001, 86(1-2): 85–95. doi:  10.1016/S0304-3991(00)00076-0
    [116] Targosz-Korecka M, Malek-Zietek KE, Brzezinka GD, et al. Morphological and nanomechanical changes in mechanosensitive endothelial cells induced by colloidal AFM probes[J]. Scanning, 2016, 38(6): 654–664. doi:  10.1002/sca.21313
    [117] Discher D, Dong C, Fredberg JJ, et al. Biomechanics: cell research and applications for the next decade[J]. Ann Biomed Eng, 2009, 37(5): 847–859. doi:  10.1007/s10439-009-9661-x
    [118] Pemberton GD, Childs P, Reid S, et al. Nanoscale stimulation of osteoblastogenesis from mesenchymal stem cells: nanotopography and nanokicking[J]. Nanomedicine (Lond), 2015, 10(4): 547–560. doi:  10.2217/nnm.14.134
    [119] Teo BK, Wong ST, Lim CK, et al. Nanotopography modulates mechanotransduction of stem cells and induces differentiation through focal adhesion kinase[J]. ACS Nano, 2013, 7(6): 4785–4798. doi:  10.1021/nn304966z
    [120] Wu YN, Law JBK, He AY, et al. Substrate topography determines the fate of chondrogenesis from human mesenchymal stem cells resulting in specific cartilage phenotype formation[J]. Nanomedicine, 2014, 10(7): 1507–1516. doi:  10.1016/j.nano.2014.04.002
    [121] Panadero JA, Lanceros-Mendez S, Ribelles JLG. Differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage tissue engineering: Individual and synergetic effects of three-dimensional environment and mechanical loading[J]. Acta Biomater, 2016, 33: 1–12. doi:  10.1016/j.actbio.2016.01.037
    [122] Dobbenga S, Fratila-Apachitei LE, Zadpoor AA. Nanopattern-induced osteogenic differentiation of stem cells - A systematic review[J]. Acta Biomater, 2016, 46: 3–14. doi:  10.1016/j.actbio.2016.09.031
    [123] Tay CY, Koh CG, Tan NS, et al. Mechanoregulation of stem cell fate via micro-/nano-scale manipulation for regenerative medicine[J]. Nanomedicine (Lond), 2013, 8(4): 623–638. doi:  10.2217/nnm.13.31
    [124] Nakayama KH, Quarta M, Paine P, et al. Treatment of volumetric muscle loss in mice using nanofibrillar scaffolds enhances vascular organization and integration[J]. Commun Biol, 2019, 2(1): 170. doi:  10.1038/s42003-019-0416-4
    [125] Catanesi M, Panella G, Benedetti E, et al. YAP/TAZ mechano-transduction as the underlying mechanism of neuronal differentiation induced by reduced graphene oxide[J]. Nanomedicine (Lond), 2018, 13(24): 3091–3106. doi:  10.2217/nnm-2018-0269
    [126] Jawad H, Boccaccini AR, Ali NN, et al. Assessment of cellular toxicity of TiO2 nanoparticles for cardiac tissue engineering applications[J]. Nanotoxicology, 2011, 5(3): 372–380. doi:  10.3109/17435390.2010.516844
    [127] Li N, Fan XL, Tang KY, et al. Nanocomposite scaffold with enhanced stability by hydrogen bonds between collagen, polyvinyl pyrrolidone and titanium dioxide[J]. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2016, 140: 287–296. doi:  10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.12.005
    [128] Pan LL, Pei XB, He R, et al. Multiwall carbon nanotubes/polycaprolactone composites for bone tissue engineering application[J]. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2012, 93: 226–234. doi:  10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.01.011
    [129] Rodriguez-Lozano FJ, García-Bernal D, Aznar-Cervantes S, et al. Potential of graphene for tissue engineering applications[J]. Transl Res, 2015, 166(4): 399–400. doi:  10.1016/j.trsl.2015.04.003
    [130] Chen GY, Pang DWP, Hwang SM, et al. A graphene-based platform for induced pluripotent stem cells culture and differentiation[J]. Biomaterials, 2012, 33(2): 418–427. doi:  10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.071
    [131] Bayir E, Sendemir A, Missirlis YF. Mechanobiology of cells and cell systems, such as organoids[J]. Biophys Rev, 2019, 11(5): 721–728. doi:  10.1007/s12551-019-00590-7
    [132] Abdel Fattah AR, Ranga A. Nanoparticles as versatile tools for Mechanotransduction in tissues and organoids[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2020, 8: 240. doi:  10.3389/fbioe.2020.00240
    [133] Wei Q, Huang CJ, Zhang Y, et al. Mechanotargeting: mechanics-dependent cellular uptake of nanoparticles[J]. Adv Mater, 2018, 30(27): 1707464. doi:  10.1002/adma.201707464
    [134] Butcher DT, Alliston T, Weaver VM. A tense situation: forcing tumour progression[J]. Nat Rev Cancer, 2009, 9(2): 108–122. doi:  10.1038/nrc2544
    [135] Mpekris F, Angeli S, Pirentis AP, et al. Stress-mediated progression of solid tumors: effect of mechanical stress on tissue oxygenation, cancer cell proliferation, and drug delivery[J]. Biomech Model Mechanobiol, 2015, 14(6): 1391–1402. doi:  10.1007/s10237-015-0682-0
    [136] Korin N, Kanapathipillai M, Matthews BD, et al. Shear-activated nanotherapeutics for drug targeting to obstructed blood vessels[J]. Science, 2012, 337(6095): 738–742. doi:  10.1126/science.1217815
    [137] Henstock JR, Rotherham M, Rashidi H, et al. Remotely activated mechanotransduction via magnetic nanoparticles promotes mineralization synergistically with bone morphogenetic protein 2: applications for injectable cell therapy[J]. Stem Cells Transl Med, 2014, 3(11): 1363–1374. doi:  10.5966/sctm.2014-0017
    [138] Tay A, Di Carlo D. Remote neural stimulation using magnetic nanoparticles[J]. Curr Med Chem, 2017, 24(5): 537–548. doi:  10.2174/0929867323666160814000442
    [139] Jiang ZY, Shan KZ, Song J, et al. Toxic effects of magnetic nanoparticles on normal cells and organs[J]. Life Sci, 2019, 220: 156–161. doi:  10.1016/j.lfs.2019.01.056
    [140] Rezvani E, Rafferty A, McGuinness C, et al. Adverse effects of nanosilver on human health and the environment[J]. Acta Biomater, 2019, 94: 145–159. doi:  10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.042
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(3)

Article Metrics

Article views(116) PDF downloads(25) Cited by()

Related
Proportional views

Mechanotransduction, nanotechnology, and nanomedicine

doi: 10.7555/JBR.34.20200063
    Corresponding author: Fumihiko Nakamura, School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300072, China. Tel: +86-22-87401830, E-mail: fnakamura@tju.edu.cn

Abstract: Mechanotransduction, a conversion of mechanical forces into biochemical signals, is essential for human development and physiology. It is observable at all levels ranging from the whole body, organs, tissues, organelles down to molecules. Dysregulation results in various diseases such as muscular dystrophies, hypertension-induced vascular and cardiac hypertrophy, altered bone repair and cell deaths. Since mechanotransduction occurs at nanoscale, nanosciences and applied nanotechnology are powerful for studying molecular mechanisms and pathways of mechanotransduction. Atomic force microscopy, magnetic and optical tweezers are commonly used for force measurement and manipulation at the single molecular level. Force is also used to control cells, topographically and mechanically by specific types of nano materials for tissue engineering. Mechanotransduction research will become increasingly important as a sub-discipline under nanomedicine. Here we review nanotechnology approaches using force measurements and manipulations at the molecular and cellular levels during mechanotransduction, which has been increasingly play important role in the advancement of nanomedicine.

Xiaowei Liu, Fumihiko Nakamura. Mechanotransduction, nanotechnology, and nanomedicine[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research. doi: 10.7555/JBR.34.20200063
Citation: Xiaowei Liu, Fumihiko Nakamura. Mechanotransduction, nanotechnology, and nanomedicine[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research. doi: 10.7555/JBR.34.20200063
    • Mechanotransduction is the process by which organisms perceive physical forces by producing biochemical signals in response. Such signals have been shown to control cell proliferation, migration, differentiation, and death[18]. The significant influence of mechanotransduction on cells suggests potential clinical importance in modulating, altering, and controlling the process.

      The recent discovery of the underlying molecular mechanisms of mechanotransduction advances the study closer to the point of clinical importance. Although mechanotransduction has been discovered for a long time and extensively studied at the cellular and tissue levels[9], it is just recently that its mechanism has been revealed at the single molecular level[4]. Although studies at cellular and tissue levels are still necessary to understand mechanotransduction, research on the process will increasingly apply nanotechnology. Clinical research into the applications of nanotechnology in mechanotransduction is becoming a sub-set of nanomedicine.

      One of nanomedicine uses nanoparticles (NPs) for site-specific delivery of drugs and diagnostic agents. Some NPs show promise in helping to reveal the workings of mechanotransduction for tissue engineering, drug delivery, diagnostics, and other medical advancements.

    • Internal and external mechanical forces to the human body such as shear forces in blood vessels, stretching, actomyosin contraction, gravity, acoustic vibration, and pressure can regulate cellular development and various processes[4,1015] (Fig. 1). For example, exposure to the microgravity environment of space travel reduces bone and muscle formation, and changes immune response and metabolism[25]. Mechanical niches of stem and cancer cells also regulate their fates such as differentiation and proliferation[2627]. During aging, rigidity of human epithelial cells markedly increases, which also affects differentiation of their progenitor cells[2829]. In these biological processes, DNA sequencing identified many expressed genes induced by the signals produced via mechanotransduction in response to mechanical inputs[3031]. However, what is missing in mechanotransduction research is a complete understanding of how forces are sensed, transmitted, and transduced into gene expression. Fig. 2 illustrates possible mechanotransduction pathways that have been partially revealed as described below. The major obstacle to reveal the molecular mechanism of mechanotransduction and its translation into gene expression is the difficulty in reconstitution of the reaction in vitro, where mechanical force is a difficult parameter to reproduce and disappears once biological samples are lysed. Despite the challenges, methods have been developed to unravel the molecular mechanisms of mechanotransduction.

      Figure 1.  Mechanical forces influence human physiology and pathophysiology.

      Figure 2.  A schematic overview of how mechanical forces are converted to gene expression in a cell.

    • To understand a biological system, scientists apply "input" into the system and read "output" as a standard approach. For mechanotransduction research, input is the mechanical forces applied to a cell or tissue (Fig. 1). Applying a controlled input of force can be achieved in several ways. For example, tissue culture cells can be repeatedly stretched on an elastic substrate in various directions and frequencies to mimic muscle, blood vessels, and lungs[3638]. Hydrostatic pressure and membrane-stretching can activate channel proteins[3940]. Cells can be compressed using a dynamic compressive bioreactor to engineer articular cartilage tissue and to mimic periodontal cells[4143]. Shear stress can be generated by a pump to mimic blood flow[37,44]. Even microgravity can be tested on satellites and space stations, or in a rotating wall vessel bioreactor on the Earth[12,4547]. Infrasound (0–20 Hz) and low-frequency noise (20–500 Hz) are also mechanical stimuli that influence physiology of cells and can be applied in research settings[48]. In addition to these external forces, internal forces can be controlled by inhibiting myosin. Stiffness of the substrate also affects the forces on adhesion molecules that link to the cytoskeleton and the nucleus[4951].

      "Output" in the experimental methods above includes gene expression, morphological changes, translocation of protein, and post-translational modification as these methods are well-established. However, as previously mentioned, these methods do not address how forces are sensed, transmitted, and transduced into gene expression, which have remained challenging questions in the field of mechanotransduction research.

    • Accumulated evidence demonstrates that mechanical forces trigger conformational changes of proteins to activate them. For example, piezo cation channels use a lever-like mechanogating mechanism to function as a mechanotransduction channel[52]. Filamin A, an actin cross-linking protein, exposes a cryptic binding site for integrins and other binding partners when actomyosin contraction dissociates the domain-domain pair of filamin A[5357]. Talin unfolding occurs in the R8 domain upon force application to activate downstream signaling[58]. Blood shear force can induce unfolding of the A2 domain of von Willebrand factor to expose the binding site for the glycoprotein Iα receptor in the A1 domain, cryptic A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 13 (ADAMTS13) binding sites, and the cleavage site in the A2 domain[5960]. Deflection of stereocilia of hair cells by acoustic forces pulls open a calcium channel and activates the current through the channel[61].

      All of these demonstrations rely on detailed structural information as no robust method is available to identify a mechanosensing molecule. A nanotechnology-based method that specifically recognizes mechanosensitive changes without recognizing non-mechanosensitive changes which could take place at the same time as mechanosensitive changes, is necessary to advance our knowledge of force sensing mechanisms. These changes could include not only conformational changes of protein but also other biological molecules such as membrane lipids and sugars.

    • In theory, force transmission can be mediated by cell-matrix interaction, cell-to-cell interaction, cytoskeleton, pressure, and fluidic flow and vibration (Fig. 2)[6264]. The cytoskeleton-mediated transmission is fast even across long distances compared to molecular diffusion in cells, presumably due to the direct connection of the sensor to a target[65]. However, in theory, pressure change, stretching, and vibration can also transmit faster than molecular diffusion. The cytoskeleton is directly connected to the linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complex to regulate gene expression[51,6667]. In addition, osmotic shocks stretch the nucleus and nuclear pores to facilitate active transport of Yes-associated protein 1 (YAP), a transcriptional co-factor, into the nucleus[68].

      The only means to identify a force transmitter is the perturbation of a candidate. For example, cytoskeleton can be perturbed by depolymerization agents such as latrunculin and nocodazole[6970]. The LINC complex can be disrupted by targeting the component of the complex using siRNA and genome editing[68]. Another sophisticated method is necessary to identify and monitor force transmission at micro or nanoscales. For example, CRISPR screening may facilitate discovery of key mechanotransmitter and rationally designed fluorescent probe may monitor force transmission in real time[71].

    • The mechanotransduction channels can directly convert mechanical forces into biochemical signals by incorporating ions into cytosol[52,61] (Fig. 2). Upon mechanical activation, filamin A can connect to integrin, smoothelin, and fimbacin, and dissociate FilGAP, a Rac-specific GTPase-activating protein[5457]. The filamin A-integrin interaction regulates cell adhesion and migration, but functions of force-dependent interactions with smoothelin and fimbacin are not known[72]. Binding of FilGAP to filamin A targets FilGAP to sites of membrane protrusion, where it antagonizes Rac to control actin remodeling[73]. Mechanical forces also trigger proteolysis by exposing a cleavage site[5960]. Enlargement of nuclear pore size regulated by mechanical forces such as substrate stiffness, indentation of plasma membrane by atomic force microscopy (AFM), and osmotic shocks enables the transport of YAP from cytosol to the nucleus to regulate gene expression[68,74]. Other means to convert mechanical forces into biochemical signals use actin polymerization that is triggered by mechanical forces by unknown mechanisms[7579]. Polymerization of actin dissociates myocardin-related transcription factor A from unpolymerized actin in cytosol facilitates nuclear localization of mitochondrial transcription factor A to associate with several serum response factor target promoters[8082].

      Although several other molecules such as cadherin, catenin, and merlin are shown to be involved in mechanotransduction pathways, how mechanical forces are exactly converted to biochemical signals through these molecules are not known[8386]. The major obstacle is the lack of nanoscale structural information before and after activation by mechanical forces.

    • Measurement of forces applied to tissue, cells, and eventually a single molecule is the basis of mechanotransduction research and application (Fig. 3A and B). However, reported values of cell stiffness and viscosity vary substantially depending on methods even when different groups use the same instruments (e.g., elastic and viscous moduli of MCF-7 breast cancer cells can vary 1000-fold and 100-fold, respectively)[87]. Therefore, scientists need to be aware of the limitations of force measurement and confounding factors such as heat introduced by probes. Unfolding forces of protein domains such as fibronectin type Ⅲ and immunoglobulin domains also vary depending on methods due to different loading forces, loading rate, and other factors[8891]. AFM measures the forces required to unfold individual domains of titin, ranging from 150 to 300 pN, whereas magnetic tweezers detected the critical force (~5.4 pN) at which unfolding and folding have equal probability[90,92]. This is the case for unfolding of filamin immunoglobulin domains too. The unfolding force ranged from 50 to 220 pN by AFM, whereas magnetic tweezers revealed two different modes of unfolding at <10 pN and >20 pN[88,93]. The difference between AFM and the magnetic tweezers is that the loading rate of the magnetic tweezers is much lower than that used in the AFM experiments[9394]. Although the magnetic tweezers is a choice to measure physical property of biological molecule in physiological condition, AFM can be used to characterize molecule under high-force pulling and to determine molecular-molecular interaction.

      Figure 3.  Application of nanotechnology on mechanotransduction research.

      The optical tweezers demonstrated that application of 2–5 pN to filamin domain increases the affinity to its binding partners[95]. The computational calculation of the critical force required to denature an immunoglobulin domain is calculated to be 3.5–5 pN using the energy difference between the folded and unraveled domain[96]. Since the forces generated by single myosin or kinesin molecules are 2- to 7-pN force, single and multiple motor molecules are capable of unfolding an immunoglobulin domain[9798].

      Nanoscale molecular sensors can also measure mechanical forces loaded on a single molecule in living cells. Fluorescent resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based probes can be genetically constructed and expressed in living cells. Since FRET changes correlate with forces, force can be measured in the cells. For example, a vinculin probe demonstrated that tension across vinculin in stable focal adhesion is about 2.5 pN and changes as cells migrate[99]. In talin, the rod domain experiences a force gradient (in the single piconewton regime) upon integrin-mediated cell adhesion[100], which is consistent with single molecular analysis[101]. At cell-cell junctions, it was estimated that cadherin-catenin complex is subjected to a tension of ~5 pN under resting conditions rising to ~50 pN in stressed conditions consistent with experimental measurement[102]. FRET-based tension sensors can be used to determine traction forces at the cell surface that attaches to substrate as well[103]. Recently developed nanofiber optic force transducers have the potential to measure intracellular forces with sub-piconewton force sensitivity and a nanoscale footprint[104].

    • Nanotechnology is powerful to mechanically manipulate conformational changes of a molecule. For example, magnetic NP is a promising technique for activating a specific signaling pathway, controlling stem-cell differentiation, inducing cancer-cell death, and treating nervous system diseases[105107]. The NPs can be made in customized sizes and surface characteristics with a high surface to volume ratio, and can be ingested by cells. Magnetic micropillar substrate can also be used for mechanotransduction research and application[108]. Optical and magnetic tweezers that control from nano- to 2–3 micron-particles can be attached to specific position of a molecule through linkers and internal control such as antibody and green fluorescent protein[109111]. AFM allows a single molecule to be imaged but also to be manipulated using a cantilever tip[112113]. Furthermore, high-speed AFM has recently been developed to record dynamic action of biological molecules (currently at 10–16 frames/s)[114]. These techniques can be applied to mechanically stimulate cells[68,115116].

    • Although mechanotransduction is essential during development and repair of tissues, the difficulty of mimicking the natural properties of tissues is one of the bottlenecks in applying mechanotransduction research to tissue engineering. Nanotechnology through customized nanomaterials has the potential to solve this problem. For example, stem cells can be differentiated into different types of cells by manipulating substrate rigidity and topography[117119] (Fig. 3C and D). More specifically, a defined substrate topography induces chondrogenesis and osteogenesis from human mesenchymal stem cells[120123]. Culturing myoblasts on aligned nanofibers engineer muscle (myotube) that can be used for skeletal muscle repair and generation[124]. Moreover, reduced graphene oxide, a low-weight 3D aerogel-like material with pore diameter in the range of approximately 5–10 μm, induces neuronal differentiation of human neuroblastoma cells by modulating RhoA/Hippo pathway[125]. Doping NPs into hydrogel improves the scaffold mechanics for tissue engineering such as treatment of myocardial infarction and skin scar, bone regeneration, proliferation and differentiation of bone marrow and periodontal stem cells[126130]. These results suggest that nanotechnology can be used to manipulate matrix and tissue mechanics to control cell fate to repair and generate tissues. In this aspect, an organoid, a simplified and miniaturized version of an organ produced in vitro in 3D, can be a good model to study application of mechanotransduction regulated by nanotechnology[131132].

      Although NP-based diagnosis and therapy are the major topics of nanomedicine, it was recently demonstrated that cellular uptake of NPs are cell mechanics dependent[133]. Since mechanical properties of normal and diseased cells are significantly different[134], these results suggest the application of mechanotargeting of NPs in nanomedicine[135]. Moreover, the success of a shear-activated drug-delivery system inspired by platelet activation suggests that such a system can be applicable to perturb a specific mechanotransduction pathway[136].

      Magnetic NP is a promising tool to remotely activate mechanotransduction. For example, mechanical activation of force-sensitive TWIK related potassium (TREK1 K+) channel and integrin using magnetic NPs promotes mineralization of bones[137]. The magnetic NPs can also remotely control brain circuits[138].

      Other nanomaterials possessing particular physical and chemical properties, such as carbon nanotubes and nanofibers can be used for tissue engineering. These materials are biocompatible, stable, easy to fabricate and functionalize, and have a potential effect on neurogenesis, osteogenesis, and stem cell differentiation due to their mechanical properties related to mechanotransduction[123].

      Although application of nanotechnology in mechanotransduction research and tissue engineering is already beginning to happen and show promising results, safety of nanomaterial should be vigorously tested before medical application[139140].

    • Mechanical forces have a profound effect on human physiology and pathophysiology. Although research on tissue and cellular level is still necessary to understand mechanotransduction, its molecular mechanism at nano level should eventually be revealed for the potential of clinically significant findings. Nanotechnology provides a new set of tools for studying mechanotransduction and for its application in nanomedicine. Such nanomedicine includes force-induced therapeutics, diagnosis, and tissue engineering, which will offer unprecedented opportunities for innovative medicine. However, an understanding of mechanotransduction at the molecular level is still nascent, retaining its application in nanomedicine. Of critical importance is the need to identify a full-set of mechanosensing molecules and reveal how forces are sensed, transmitted, and converted to biochemical signals and gene expression. Such understanding should lead to the development of more selective drugs and treatment.

    • This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31771551 to F.N.).

Reference (140)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return